Take a Letter

Dec. 28, 2000
Last month I wrote how highway industry personnel with an interest in the reauthorization of the federal surface transportation act (ISTEA) could contact their representatives and senators in Washington, D.C., before the Oct. 1 deadline for passage of the bill. Several industry personnel have suggested that ROADS & BRIDGES print a letter that our readers can cut out, sign and mail or fax to their respective representatives. With the assistance of The Road Information Program (TRIP), the following letter is offered.
Last month I wrote how highway industry personnel with an interest in the reauthorization of the federal surface transportation act (ISTEA) could contact their representatives and senators in Washington, D.C., before the Oct. 1 deadline for passage of the bill. Several industry personnel have suggested that ROADS & BRIDGES print a letter that our readers can cut out, sign and mail or fax to their respective representatives. With the assistance of The Road Information Program (TRIP), the following letter is offered.

Dear __________________:

One of the most important legislative initiatives in the 105th Congress is the reauthorization of the federal highway and mass transit programs. The success or failure of the reauthorization of ISTEA--which is being called NEXTEA (the National Economic Crossroads Efficiency Act)--will directly affect the lives of all Americans.

I am writing to ask that you work to pass a transportation bill that provides the increases in highway funding that are desperately needed in order to maintain, rehabilitate, reconstruct and rebuild the lifeline to America's economic well-being; it's highway system.

The allocation of federal highway user-fee revenue among the states has been the single most contentious issue in the reauthorization debate. The irony is that the allocation debate--along with the divisive and concomitant disputes over which state gets more funding--can effectively be eliminated.

What is required to solve this dilemma? Swift action on two fronts: first, the redirection of the 1993 4.3 cent federal motor fuels tax revenue to the Highway Trust Fund; and second, the removal of the Highway Trust Fund from the unified federal budget.

The 4.3 cent gas tax increase was earmarked for the general treasury fund in 1993 for deficit reduction purposes. I believe that diversion of the 4.3 cent gas tax for non-highway purposes was an ill-advised action in view of the U.S. DOT's assessment that an additional $15 billion in highway spending is needed annually just to maintain existing conditions! This additional revenue could increase every state's share of federal highway funding.

Implementation of these two actions will ensure the reauthorization debate results in actually meeting the country's transportation needs. Your support of these proposals would help guarantee our state receives the maximum possible return on the excise tax contributions made by your constituents to the federal-aid highway program.

Sincerely,

Sponsored Recommendations

The Science Behind Sustainable Concrete Sealing Solutions

Extend the lifespan and durability of any concrete. PoreShield is a USDA BioPreferred product and is approved for residential, commercial, and industrial use. It works great above...

Powerful Concrete Protection For ANY Application

PoreShield protects concrete surfaces from water, deicing salts, oil and grease stains, and weather extremes. It's just as effective on major interstates as it is on backyard ...

Concrete Protection That’s Easy on the Environment and Tough to Beat

PoreShield's concrete penetration capabilities go just as deep as our American roots. PoreShield is a plant-based, eco-friendly alternative to solvent-based concrete sealers.

Proven Concrete Protection That’s Safe & Sustainable

Real-life DOT field tests and university researchers have found that PoreShieldTM lasts for 10+ years and extends the life of concrete.