A new study conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) shows that users of managed lanes are far more diverse across income levels than previously thought.
Managed lanes seek to reduce traffic congestion and improve travel times along urban highways. In Minnesota, where they are known as E-ZPass lanes, managed lanes are available to carpoolers and transit users for free during high-traffic times, while solo motorists pay a fee.
To find ways to improve equity in planning for managed lanes, MnDOT and the Local Road Research Board set out to understand the demographics of E-ZPass users.
In a blog post, MnDOT explained that investigators analyzed demographics in four main corridors of Interstate 394 (I-394), I-35W and I-35E using techniques that summarize and visualize both statistical and spatial data distributions.
Numerous data sources identified demographic characteristics for travel shed users and E-ZPass lane users, such as transponder owners, carpoolers and transit riders. Those characteristics included population, income, poverty level, race, education, disability, travel mode, and the age of the head of household, the agency said.
The comparison of demographics of E-ZPass lane users with the general travel population revealed that E-ZPass lane users are slightly more racially diverse than the larger population. A lower percentage of people with disabilities, however, use managed lanes than use the travel sheds. There is little income difference between E-ZPass lane users and travel shed users, even though more E-ZPass account holders have higher incomes, the researchers found.
The study also identified nine measures transportation agencies can use in evaluating potential equity impacts of managed lane projects, such as: shorter travel times, increased accessibility to jobs, and new trips originating in underrepresented communities; improved local road safety; air quality and noise level improvements; and input and involvement from community residents in project alternatives.
Additional recommendations included collecting more demographic data from transponder owners; exploring project enhancement opportunities to improve outcomes in underrepresented communities; and elevating community voices in research, planning, design and implementation efforts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: The Minnesota Department of Transportation
