TRANSIT: Study finds gaps in intercity rail, bus forcing more driving

A new study from DePaul University looked at bus and rail travel patterns in the U.S. over more than a decade

Transit News August 24, 2017
Printer-friendly version
Rail transit

Declining gas prices and fewer public transportation options are forcing travelers back behind the wheel, according to a new study by DePaul University’s Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, which found:

  • Lower fuel prices and heightened competition from airlines have weakened demand for Amtrak and express coach bus lines;
  • Gaps in ground transportation have emerged, making efforts to avoid driving on some popular routes more difficult than just a few years ago;
  • Numerous metropolitan areas remain largely inaccessible to travelers who seek to avoid flying or driving but are unwilling to use conventional bus lines such as Greyhound; and
  • Some short- and mid-distance routes with more than one million trips a year have no service by Amtrak or express coach lines, including Los Angeles to Phoenix, Cleveland to Detroit, Chicago to Columbus, Las Vegas to Phoenix, and Ft. Myers to Tampa.


Researchers at DePaul have been following the ebb and flow of bus and rail travel in the U.S. for more than a decade. Starting in 2005, optimism ran high that expansions to the intercity bus and rail system would provide travelers with increasingly viable alternatives to driving, particularly on short- and middle-distance routes.


However by 2015, the hoped-for transformation of this intercity travel market has lost steam. Bus and train traffic had ebbed, buffeted by low fuel prices, heightened competition from airlines, and barriers to planned service improvements. The rollout of new trains slowed. Express coach lines began trimming frequency on some routes and ended service to other cities altogether.


Drawing upon these findings, the researchers outline steps that public entities can take to give travelers more opportunities for ground-based intercity services. For example, researchers call for more effective arrangements to support states working together to improve rail corridors. They call for planners to follow the example of Boston, Denver, and Washington, D.C., by creating dedicated, centrally-located bus terminals that can help relieve overburdened curbside pickup spots. In addition, researchers cite Amtrak’s “Thruway Bus Network” program, which connects riders on buses and trains, as a model for other cities to follow.



Source: Metro Magazine

Overlay Init