ROADS/BRIDGES: The aisle is wide and parties divide over Mich. truck weight debate

Dec. 4, 2014

The state currently tolerates nearly double the average weights of any other U.S. state

With roads seemingly crumbling everywhere, the demand placed on those roads is a logical bone of contention—notably in the state of Michigan, where lawmakers have decided that truck weight restrictions are just fine the way they are.

A bill introduced by State Sen. Steve Bieda (D-Warren) called for a cut in the maximum weight a semi-truck can carry from 164,000 lb to 80,000 lb. The bill was brought to the state Senate floor without a committee hearing and was summarily rejected by a vote of 15 to 22, a margin that nearly perfectly reflected a divide of political party lines. Only Republican Sens. Jack Brandenburg, Tory Rocca and Patrick Colbeck crossed the aisle to side with Senate Democrats, all of whom uniformly backed the measure. Remaining Republicans, with the backing of the trucking industry, bore the muscle to keep the bill from reaching the desk of Gov. Rick Synder, a fellow Republican.

While the new regulations would have increased revenues to the state by requiring an additional 8,000 to 10,000 trucks to be registered, as well as increased registration fees overall by $1,660 per year, they would also, according to analysis done on behalf of the Michigan Department of Transportation, cause more maintenance needs on the state's roads.

Larger trucks, those capable of trafficking more than 150,000 lb of weight, spread their load weight over 11 axles, while 80,000 lb loadbearers can spread weight over only five axles. Lighter loads would mean more trucks on the road, thus requiring additional road maintenance. Therefore, MDOT opposed the bill bon the grounds that it would not only harm Michigan's roads, but hurt the trucking industry as well because present fleets are designed to match Michigan's present weight limits.

"The damage to the Michigan economy is unknown, but would be significant. Although the 12,000 trucks registered for over 80,000 pounds are a small fraction of total trucks, they are inordinately important to Michigan's most basic industries," said Jeff Cranson, spokesman for MDOT, in a statement. "If this bill were enacted, about 12,000 trucks owned by Michigan firms would be rendered valueless, and would have to be supplemented by an additional 8,000 to 10,000 new vehicles.”

Things look to stay heavy and stay on the move up north for the foreseeable future.

Sponsored Recommendations

The Science Behind Sustainable Concrete Sealing Solutions

Extend the lifespan and durability of any concrete. PoreShield is a USDA BioPreferred product and is approved for residential, commercial, and industrial use. It works great above...

Powerful Concrete Protection For ANY Application

PoreShield protects concrete surfaces from water, deicing salts, oil and grease stains, and weather extremes. It's just as effective on major interstates as it is on backyard ...

Concrete Protection That’s Easy on the Environment and Tough to Beat

PoreShield's concrete penetration capabilities go just as deep as our American roots. PoreShield is a plant-based, eco-friendly alternative to solvent-based concrete sealers.

Proven Concrete Protection That’s Safe & Sustainable

Real-life DOT field tests and university researchers have found that PoreShieldTM lasts for 10+ years and extends the life of concrete.