MAP-21: ARTBA chairman points to three factors that could hinder new highway bill

Hours of service for truck drivers, Clean Water Act and use of coal ash could carry negative effect

July 19, 2012

Regulatory inefficiencies and threats in the areas of hours of services for truck drivers, the Clean Water Act, and the use of coal ash could undermine the historic policy reforms put in place by the newly enacted highway and transit law–MAP-21, the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) chairman told Congress on July 19. 

Testifying before the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform, 2012 ARTBA Chairman Paul Yarossi, president of HNTB Holdings, explained that some regulations provide a “sense of predictability and ensure a balance between meeting our nation’s transportation mobility needs and protecting the public interest.” However, he cited three areas that “hinder, rather than help this balance.”  

Noting that a “one-size-fits-all” approach would not work, Yarossi urged Congress to re-examine rules governing hours of service for long-haul truckers. He explained that transportation construction industry drivers tend to drive short distances to and from a work site rather than the long trips of commercial drivers. 

“Such limitations can disrupt the efficient deployment of professionals and resources on the construction jobsite, without a demonstrable increase in safety,” he told the committee. “Further, it increases costs that would otherwise support capital and personnel expansions.”

Second, Yarossi pointed to draft guidance from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that would greatly expand the reach of the Clean Water Act to include roadside ditches within the jurisdiction of wetlands.

“Virtually every road and roadway improvement project has a ditch associated with it,” explained Yarossi. “Notwithstanding the complete lack of viability of such a plan, it would inject major uncertainty and delays in the delivery of transportation benefits.”  

Finally, the ARTBA chairman highlighted the EPA’s possible designation of coal ash as a “hazardous waste.” Coal ash is commonly used material in concrete and a key component in transportation infrastructure improvements. He cited a 2011 ARTBA economic study, which found that removing coal ash from transportation construction would cost the public and private sectors more than $104 billion over the next 20 years. Such increases could threaten jobs and result in increased material costs, thereby negating any cost savings that would develop as a result of policy reforms passed in MAP-21. 

The full text of ARTBA’s testimony can be found in the Regulatory Affairs section of

Related Articles

Construction employment declined in the District of Columbia and every state except South Dakota in April, an analysis by the Associated General…
May 28, 2020
The South Carolina DOT (SCDOT) has released its initial projections of the financial impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the department,…
May 27, 2020
Toll road executives from around the nation during a virtual event discussed plans to reduce or suspend capital investments this year due to the…
May 26, 2020
Gilcrease Expressway West project in Tulsa, Oklahoma
Image: Oklahoma Turnpike Authority
The U.S. DOT’s Build America Bureau will provide up to a $120.1 million Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan to the…
May 21, 2020