Corps of Engineers finds problems with Charles County highway permit application

Dec. 5, 2008

Approval for the Cross County Connector in Charles County, Md., could be in jeopardy. According to a recent letter from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to county officials, there are significant problems with the permit application for the $70-million highway.

In the eight-page letter, the Washington Post reported, the Corps asks the county to clarify the project’s purpose, conduct a traffic pattern study, suggest possible alternatives, reduce environmental effects and respond to concerns from the public.

Approval for the Cross County Connector in Charles County, Md., could be in jeopardy. According to a recent letter from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to county officials, there are significant problems with the permit application for the $70-million highway.

In the eight-page letter, the Washington Post reported, the Corps asks the county to clarify the project’s purpose, conduct a traffic pattern study, suggest possible alternatives, reduce environmental effects and respond to concerns from the public.

County officials have argued that the project, which would link Indian Head Highway with Route 5, will relieve congestion on other east-west roads in the northwest part of the county. However, Corps officials found that the traffic information is outdated.

“Detailed information on potential mass transit alternatives that may address traffic concerns in this area should be provided,” wrote William P. Seib, chief of the Corps’ Maryland Section Southern, the Washington Post reported.

Additionally, the letter focused on the possible environmental damage the highway's construction could cause to the Mattawoman Creek watershed. The Environmental Protection Agency has said that the connector could cause “significant direct, indirect and cumulative impacts to an area of great environmental value, diversity and sensitivity."

Sponsored Recommendations

The Science Behind Sustainable Concrete Sealing Solutions

Extend the lifespan and durability of any concrete. PoreShield is a USDA BioPreferred product and is approved for residential, commercial, and industrial use. It works great above...

Champion Flame Shield® Phenolic Conduit Guide

Learn how Champion Flame Shield® Provides a Safe Solution in Fire Sensitive Applications

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

See how fiberglass conduit stacks up to the competition in crucial areas like weight, corrosion resistance and installation cost.

Proven Concrete Protection That’s Safe & Sustainable

Real-life DOT field tests and university researchers have found that PoreShieldTM lasts for 10+ years and extends the life of concrete.