There's a reason nobody has come up with a brilliant invention called the "window mat." You can approach just about any door in America, but peering through a clear opening may be grounds for a public stoning. And Ma and Pa Kettle are certainly not going to provide a dry place for your feet in the middle of their tulip bed.
Everybody wants their privacy--and any invader must risk paying an embarrassing penalty, whether it is a scowl from the family room couch or a public lawsuit. I recently was watching a news clip about the tiny black box automakers are now placing in their product. This device can throw out all kinds of information, like if and when you wear your seatbelt and what happened leading up to an accident. Supporters of this type of nose-sticking technology believe it's the best way to make cars and the road safer. Americans, however, would much rather take a severe blow to the head than lose an inch of "me" space. Some have threatened lawsuits.
The state of Virginia is about to embark on a study which will once again test the touchiness of thy neighbor. There are talks of the need of another Potomac River bridge north of the Capital Beltway. Research will call for a consultant to videotape license plates of vehicles crossing the cramped American Legion Bridge in both directions. The plate numbers would then be sent to the department of motor vehicles, which will provide ZIP codes of the taped travelers. From here, officials will be able to see where the cars' final resting place is, if indeed they still live at the registered ZIP code.
This study, which will cost $70,000-$125,000, can be much more effective, but nerves seem to be getting in the way. Back when there was chatter about the possibility of a new Woodrow Wilson Bridge similar data was collected--but the transportation authority poked a little further. Instead of ZIP codes, the demand was for street addresses which were used to send postcards containing a few simple questions about trips taken across the Potomac. All in all feedback was positive. Based on the information provided, planners were able to see if people were out on business and took the route daily or if they were driving at a more leisurely pace. Still, there were a few who wanted to preserve their privacy, which has left a noticeable worry wart. Nobody seems to be willing to risk stepping into anyone's inner circle this time around.
If you ask me, videotaping certainly beats the alternative. Two years ago a federal study on American Legion Bridge travel patterns was canceled after the value was deemed worthless. Here they looked at the general demand for a new bridge. During public forums people wanted to know exactly where they planned on building the span, but the non-verbal answer was a shrug. Oh, they had a map full of colored lines of where this one crossover may land, but nobody knew the exact location.
"Because they didn't know, the people were against it," said Ronald Kirby, transportation planning director for the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
People want to know every little piece of building specification, and they deserve it. They also need to know why you're about to insert more drilled shafts into the earth. With that demand hanging overhead doesn't it make sense to use a system that will tell a concerned citizen that 65% of the those crossing over the American Legion Bridge do it because they are going or returning from work, and that if a new span is created congestion will decrease by as much as 50% thus subtracting 20 minutes off your precious travel time AND removing .004% of pollutants from the atmosphere? (By the way, these numbers aren't real, I'm just throwing them out to make a point.)
Or perhaps we could make motorists stop at the bridge and ask them a few questions about where they are coming from and where they are headed. Oops, people would be looking into windows again. Scratch that idea.