GAO report calls for improvements to FTA's Capital Investment Grants program

Report calls on agency to make its review process more transparent and effective

July 17, 2020
A project extending commuter rail services in California is one of many projects that has received FTA Capital Investment Grants program funding.
A project extending commuter rail services in California is one of many projects that has received FTA Capital Investment Grants program funding. Image: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit via GAO

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently released a report calling on the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to make its review process more transparent and effective for the agency's Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program.

The GAO says FTA’s role is to evaluate and rate projects based on statutory criteria and make recommendations to Congress. Those seeking grants must follow a multi-step, multi-year development process during which FTA reviews information about the project.

Highlights from the report say that sponsors of most of the 66 projects in the CIG program told GAO that they have experienced delays moving through at least one aspect of the program's development process. 

Based on GAO's analysis, the causes of delays sponsors reported experiencing during the program's development process were frequently factors unique to each project or local in nature, such as challenges completing agreements with local utility companies or other rail operators.

GAO found that some sponsors reported aspects of FTA's reviews confusing or expected FTA to take action sooner than may be reasonable. GAO found that FTA documents its reviews but, according to several sponsors, did not always communicate decisions to sponsors in a timely manner, taking weeks, months, or longer. Some sponsors also told GAO that they thought FTA was sometimes reluctant to communicate certain decisions, such as the reason why their project was not advancing, to them in writing.

The GAO says it recommends that FTA take steps to: clarify aspects of the methods it uses and factors it considers when reviewing projects; review agency guidance to identify aspects that may be outdated or confusing; and communicate information, such as the reason why a project is not advancing, to sponsors in a timely manner.

--------

SOURCE: U.S. Government Accountability Office

Related Articles

Oklahoma Commission adopts five-year county roads and bridges plan
The Oklahoma Transportation Commission awarded a nearly $32 million contract for reconstruction of the I-35 bridges over U.S. 77 and the BNSF Railway near Thackerville in Love County. Image: Oklahoma DOT
The Oklahoma Transportation Commission this week adopted an updated five-year County Improvements for Roads and Bridges (CIRB) plan. The FY 2022-2026…
August 05, 2021
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) today announced an award totaling $5 million to the International Transportation Learning Center (ITLC) to…
August 02, 2021
On Sunday, Aug. 1, a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators released the text of a sweeping $1 trillion infrastructure plan, which moved forward with a…
August 02, 2021
The U.S. House of Representatives yesterday passed a 2022 Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies funding bill as…
July 30, 2021
expand_less