Tulloch wetlands litigation drags on, ARTBA & industry allies file legal brief

April 4, 2005

The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) joined the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association and several other organizations in challenging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ latest attempt to regulate “incidental fallback” during construction operations that take place in, or near the “navigable waters of the United States.” The challenged regulations affect activities including ditch digging, channelization and excavation.

The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) joined the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association and several other organizations in challenging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ latest attempt to regulate “incidental fallback” during construction operations that take place in, or near the “navigable waters of the United States.” The challenged regulations affect activities including ditch digging, channelization and excavation.

ARTBA filed a Mar. 25 brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit arguing the Clean Water Act (CWA) was never meant to regulate activities which only result in an “incidental fallback” of materials into the waters of the U.S. ARTBA also highlighted the negative impacts of the Corps proposal on the transportation construction industry.

The so-called “Tulloch rule” involves a 1993 decision by the Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to extend the legal definition of “discharge of dredged material” in wetlands development decisions to include the re-deposition of material caused by earthmoving equipment incident to land clearing and other excavation activities. The agencies’ intent was to use “incidental fallback” as a basis for requiring federal permits under the CWA.

ARTBA and its litigation partners first challenged the Tulloch rule nearly a decade ago, winning an initial court decision in 1997 that reduced the jurisdiction of the Corps to regulate construction activities in wetland areas. The Clinton Administration unsuccessfully appealed the ruling five separate times.

In 2001, the Corps redrafted the rule, but the practical effects have still been the same, the association says. ARTBA has taken legal action once again to stop the Corps from attempting the same type of regulation the courts previously struck down.

Oral arguments in the case have not yet been scheduled.

Sponsored Recommendations

The Science Behind Sustainable Concrete Sealing Solutions

Extend the lifespan and durability of any concrete. PoreShield is a USDA BioPreferred product and is approved for residential, commercial, and industrial use. It works great above...

Powerful Concrete Protection For ANY Application

PoreShield protects concrete surfaces from water, deicing salts, oil and grease stains, and weather extremes. It's just as effective on major interstates as it is on backyard ...

Concrete Protection That’s Easy on the Environment and Tough to Beat

PoreShield's concrete penetration capabilities go just as deep as our American roots. PoreShield is a plant-based, eco-friendly alternative to solvent-based concrete sealers.

Proven Concrete Protection That’s Safe & Sustainable

Real-life DOT field tests and university researchers have found that PoreShieldTM lasts for 10+ years and extends the life of concrete.