TRAFFIC CAMS: Ohio House set to debate potential traffic camera ban

Current bill would keep them in school zones; supporters argue cameras needed for safety

June 26, 2013

A bill that would significantly limit municipal use of traffic cameras for enforcing speed laws and red light violations in Ohio was sent to the state House of Representatives for a vote on Tuesday. The bill may or may not make its way through the General Assembly before lawmakers break for the summer.


Originally, the bill was meant to ban use of traffic cameras completely. Before it left the House Transportation, Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee, however, an amendment was made to allow continued use of the cameras in school zones, where safety is a primary concern. The amendment also stipulated that signs must be present alerting drivers to the cameras, and a police officer must be on-site to monitor the equipment.


Opponents of the cameras contend that communities are using them largely as revenue generators via fines leveled to those caught speeding or running red lights. For example, in Elmwood Place, Ohio—a town of 2,100—cameras levied $1.5 million in fines on 20,000 speeders over a two-week period in 2012.

Supporters argue that the cameras do improve safety. Columbus’s deputy public safety director cited numbers showing that cameras helped reduce right-angle crashes by 74% and rear-end crashes by 25%.

Related Articles

We’ve all heard the saying a picture is worth 1,000 words, even if it’s unclear who determined that value proposition. No one has determined the…
February 19, 2015
Traffic cameras can be the bane of the law-bending driver; the tickets issued using the cameras are notoriously hard to wiggle out of in court…
November 15, 2011