The seven streamliners

U.S. DOT whets its environmental sword on pilot projects

Article March 18, 2003
Printer-friendly version

The presidential executive order of last Sept. 18 is not the
U.S. Department of Transportation's first attempt at environmental
streamlining, but it seems to be bearing fruit. Already, the agency has
convened the first meeting of the Transportation Infrastructure Streamlining
Task Force.

The stated goal of the order was to "promote
environmental stewardship in the nation's transportation system and expedite
environmental reviews of high-priority transportation infra-structure
projects." The executive order left it up to the DOT to "formulate
and implement administrative, policy and procedural mechanisms" for
conducting environmental reviews faster than what has traditionally been a
painstaking, slow procedure.

But the DOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
have   ideas in mind and hope
to develop more through working on a set of pilot projects.

President Bush also said he was committed to complying with
the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) signed into
law in 1970.

The test cases chosen by the DOT to develop more efficient
practices include six road projects and one airport project (see sidebar). All
the test projects contacted by ROADS & BRIDGES were in the process of
writing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in compliance with NEPA.

One idea that is not really new is concurrent review, in
which all the agencies involved in a project do their work simultaneously.
Concurrent review is not a panacea, though. In a typical scenario, one agency,
maybe the DOT or the state environmental department or wildlife service, does
an analysis, and then the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says the
analysis needs to go further or to have more detail.

"Until we deal with that, and either satisfy the
information they want or persuade them that they don't need it, we're hung
up," Cindy Burbank, associate administrator for environment planning and
real estate services at the DOT, told ROADS & BRIDGES.

"We can go back and forth as to how much analysis and
detail is needed," said Burbank. "Even though we're trying to do a
concurrent review, another agency can say we need more information."

The Chittenden Circumferential Highway in Vermont, for
instance, completed an EIS in 1986. The state is now re-evaluating the
environmental statement and working out an agreement with the EPA on just how
much detail is necessary in the EIS.

The agencies involved in developing NEPA documentation for
the Ohio River Bridges have been employing a "review-as-you-write"
process, in which each section of the document, whether it has to do with
historic preservation, clean water or endangered species, is passed around for
review by the other agencies, instead of the typical procedure of waiting for
the entire document to be finished.

The major issue with the Ohio River Bridges is historic
preservation: "Louisville, in particular, has a significant amount of
historic districts and structures scattered throughout Louisville," Janice
Osadczuk, chief of the division of environment, planning and engineering for
the Indiana DOT, told ROADS & BRIDGES.

"The problem is that you've got such a plethora of
rules and regs," said Osadczuk, "and they don't all mesh properly.
They weren't written to necessarily mesh precisely. I think this process is a
good way to handle it, but it is extraordinarily manpower- and time-intensive,
and I wouldn't recommend this for every project."

Taken in context

Another idea that is gaining popularity is context-sensitive
design, which provides a greater opportunity for communities and environmental
organizations to have their concerns addressed and participate in the design
process. It is not clear whether context-sensitive design will actually shorten
the time to bring a construction job from proposal to finished design, but it
might preempt a lawsuit and thereby shorten the total time to build a road or
bridge structure.

For the Stillwater Bridge project across the St. Croix River
that forms the border between Minnesota and Wisconsin, developing a final
environmental impact statement has taken years.

"We have juxtaposed a beautiful natural environment and
a historic existing structure that is inadequate from a transportation standpoint,"
Lynne Judd, administrator of the division of transportation districts at the
Wisconsin DOT, told ROADS & BRIDGES. "The major challenge is resolving
whether the existing bridge should remain in place or should be removed."

Minnesota, which is the lead state on the project, consulted
with the various agencies and developed a draft EIS in 1995, but then the
National Park Service raised concerns about the consequences of the
construction for the St. Croix River. The Park Service opposed the "proliferation"
of bridges on the river that might occur if the old Stillwater bridge were left
in place. The Park Service contended that the river should be protected under
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and a court agreed.

"At that point, the agencies went back to the drawing
board," said Judd.

In the meantime, Stillwater Bridge is experiencing much
greater traffic than the two-lane structure was planned for when it was built
in 1931. There are already major traffic backups to cross the bridge, and
traffic is expected to increase in the future.

Prefab agreements

Programmatic agreements also are  helping to speed up environmental reviews. The agreements
are guidelines between agencies on how to handle certain situations that crop
up repeatedly.

"Instead of reinventing the wheel each time, you
negotiate up front an understanding with the other agency about how you will
handle that type of situation," said Burbank. The agreements can be
national in scope, but most are tailored to a region or state.

"There are now scores of programmatic agreements in
place that have helped move things forward," added Burbank,
"especially for the lower-impact projects."

Burbank commented that the big proj-ects with big hurdles
get all the attention, but even small road and bridge projects have
environmental issues that could be streamlined. The seven pilot projects will
serve as models.

The FHWA is hoping to apply lessons about environmental
streamlining to all of its construction projects, even though only 2.4% of them
involve an EIS. An additional 6.1% require an Environmental Assessment, which
is below the level of an EIS. The remaining 91.5% of the FHWA's proj-ects are
below the level of an Environmental Assessment, requiring only a categorical
exclusion.

"Categorical exclusions, which are the bulk of the
projects, typically take about six months to process," said Burbank.
"We're working on reducing the time required even for those projects."

In the balance

Among the other organizations in the country interested in
improving the environmental review process is an organization called Enlibra,
which is taken from the Latin word meaning "to move toward balance."

"We tend not to use the word 'environmental
streamlining.' It tends to indicate a short-circuiting of the environmental
process, and that's not what this is about," Paul Yarossi, CEO of the
engineering firm HNTB Corp. and chair of the Enlibra board of overseers, told
ROADS & BRIDGES.

Enlibra was started in 1997 by Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, a
Republican, and Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, a Democrat. The two set down the
first draft of a set of principles that seek a balance between the extremes of
prohibiting any use of natural resources and unbridled exploitation of those
resources.

Yarossi said Leavitt used the example of two hypothetical
bumper stickers, one with a slogan something like, "Earth first. We'll
mine the other planets later," and the other bearing the slogan,
"Save the Earth. Kill yourself."

"What he's saying is that there has to be something in
between the two extremes," said Yarossi.

The group is currently assembling a tool kit of case
studies, explanations and other guidance on how the principles can be used in
practice.

According to a fact sheet from Enlibra, the past 35 years of
environmental protection has 
dramatically improved the health of the country's forests, deserts,
lakes, streams and air. But the progress has been achieved through
"top-down, prescriptive, inflexible mandates," which has turned
environmental stewardship into an "endless running battle."

The old-style, top-down decision- making procedure is what
the FHWA hopes to counter with context-sensitive design. Burbank called the old
approach DAD--design, announce and defend to people who are unhappy. The new
approach is to actively seek out participation of the interested parties from
the beginning and find a solution. States such as Maryland, Kentucky, Utah,
Connecticut and Minnesota have adopted context-sensitive design strategies. The
most recent to announce the adoption of context-sensitive design for highway
construction is the new governor of Massachusetts.

The FHWA received nominations for 70 other candidate
projects for environmental streamlining. The agency is currently reviewing them
and, Burbank said, will soon announce a second set of projects that will get
priority attention.

About the author: 
Overlay Init