NO. 7 BRIDGE: Wildcat Creek Bridge (U.S. 12)

As this arch bridge proves, results are measured by quality

(This feature published as "Size Doesn't Matter" in November 2019 issue)

Brian W. Budzynski / November 05, 2019
NO. 7 BRIDGE: Wildcat Creek Bridge (U.S. 12)
Designers and contractors on a successful project are rarely as modest as those who championed the Wildcat Creek Bridge. In fact, they thought this was a pretty simple, straightforward piece of work.

“There was nothing terribly uncommon about this project,” Michael Carfagno, VP of engineering development for Contech, told Roads & Bridges. Stantec Design Manager Richard Patterson concurred, regarding specifically the creek work itself, saying, “This wasn’t a critical habitat season for the creek, so we were able to work in this limited footprint with a simple piped water run-through. It wasn’t that complicated.”

Well, complicated or not, the result is one of the best bridge builds we saw this year, and one that resulted in an enormous savings for owner Washington DOT in both time and dollars.

The original bridge was in critically poor health, and the execution of a demo and new build was a primary concern for WSDOT.

“A new bridge, yes, but also a preservation project, given the location (near Mount Rainier National Park),” Patterson told Roads & Bridges. “The existing bridge was in super bad shape. You could stand on the bridge, look through the deck and see the water; or you could be down at the water and see cars going by through the deck.”

Arches tend to hold up better in areas of seismic concern. This bridge was designed as a twin-leaf arch, meaning the concrete arch was precast in dual interlocking segments and shipped to the site for assembly. Arches offer less stress in the members and are internally braced, thus a reduced propensity for cracking and subsequent moisture intrusion. 

the Wildcat Creek Bridge was designed as a twin-leaf arch
Since arches tend to hold up better in areas of seismic concern, the Wildcat Creek Bridge was designed as a twin-leaf arch, meaning the concrete arch was precast in dual interlocking segments and shipped to the site for assembly.

“WSDOT initially called for a 150-ft single span I-girder bridge,” Carfagno said. “But with the Stantec team, we revised the recommendation. Experience has shown buried structures tend to do quite well in earthquakes, so this design worked for WSDOT’s requirements. Because of the span and rise—it is a 64-ft span with a 26-ft 4-in. vertical rise—we split the arch segments into two halves, with a tongue-in-groove joint to align the pieces together.”

Every project has a speed bump, and it was here that this project faced its own. 

“Unfortunately, the fabricator made too many groove units, so we had to improvise a bit,” Carfagno said. “We made a tongue out of plywood, and were able to make it work. No big deal, always a hiccup during any construction project. It didn’t impact the schedule at all.”

And schedule, for the most part, was everything.

“WSDOT wanted work done by October,” Patterson said, “before weather made construction too difficult. They needed something fast. There would be a detour and full closure, so we knew we needed a solution that was fast, and that kept us away from a lot of cast-in-place work; we couldn’t wait the week to 10 days for concrete to cure. So we went with precast. Precast arch structure, precast MSE wall panels, and the rest was demo of the original bridge, excavation, installs, and backfill. That way we could build in cure time for the bridge deck itself.”

This decision ultimately reduced what would have been a four- to five-month construction schedule to just 17 days. 

Arches offer less stress in the members and are internally braced
Arches offer less stress in the members and are internally braced, thus a reduced propensity for cracking and subsequent moisture intrusion.

“As a design-build, we completely changed the basis of design from the RFP drawings, and the overall timeline from design through construction was extremely fast-paced,” Thrall Hershberger, construction manager for Graham Contractors, told R&B. “We were able to prioritize the design of the long-lead item materials, such as the arch itself and the MSE panels, and began fabrication at-risk in order to meet the accelerated schedule. With the full closure, there were schedule limitations due to summer activites in the mountains and the White Pass Ski Resort area, as well as the national forest.”

There was also a month-long delay due to a local forest fire, which precluded use of the planned detour route.

“That happened at the 11th hour,” Hershberger said. “It was within a week of the pending road closure schedule. Equipment, materials, and manpower were already coordinated down to the shift, and they had to be rescheduled.”

Nonetheless, once the threat was quashed, Graham was able to reapply its construction plan in short order.

“We self-performed 85% of the construction work,” Hershberger said, “and that benefited the rescheduling. We subbed out paving and demolition of the original structure and other things, of course.”

When all was said and done, contractors were able to meet the 17-day closure limit—including paving time—before the dense winter mountain weather moved in, and as a result saved WSDOT $4 million in the bargain.

Project: Wildcat Creek Bridge (U.S. 12) 
Location: Rimrock, Washington
Owners: Washington DOT
Designer: Stantec/Contech
Contractors: Graham Contractors LTD
Cost: $8 million
Length: 64-ft arch structure
Completion Date: Oct. 22, 2018

About the Author

Budzynski is senior managing editor of Roads & Bridges.

Related Articles

NO. 1 BRIDGE: Bayonne Bridge
The Bayonne Bridge project provided nearly 1,500 jobs annually throughout construction, an estimated $380 million in wages and $1.6 billion in economic impact for the region.
Everybody loves a big-ticket bridge build. Even folks who have no real appreciation for structural engineering or the complex geometry at play in the…
November 05, 2019
NO. 2 BRIDGE: Marc Basnight Bridge (Herbert C. Bonner Bridge replacement)
One challenging aspect of the project was working in a sensitive marine environment. The project footprint is home to 20 protected species; the north end of the bridge lands in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, while the south end lands in the Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge. Several innovative solutions were employed to ensure environmental impacts were minimized.
From the time the Herbert C. Bonner Bridge was built in 1963 over the Oregon Inlet along the North Carolina coast, the structure was in trouble.…
November 05, 2019
NO. 3 BRIDGE: 41st Street Pedestrian Bridge
The city of Chicago has seen a boom of dynamic architectural development in the last 15 years, and the new 41st Street Bridge, which was designed by architects at Cordogan, Clark & Associates, serves as yet another jewel in the Windy City crown.
Through an international design competition called “Bridging the Drive,” the City of Chicago constructed a new signature pedestrian bridge at 41st…
November 05, 2019
NO. 4 BRIDGE: Lesner Bridge
The city had decided early on that they wanted a segmental bridge in order to have longer spans, more curves on the structure, and an aesthetic quality that would fit the bridge into the landscape. One of the factors that was considered in the design phase of the project was to create more space between the pier columns in order to provide unobstructed views of the Chesapeake Bay and Lynnhaven River.
Anyone traversing the area of the Lynnhaven Inlet along Virginia’s southern coast at nighttime would be remiss if they failed to notice the dazzling…
November 05, 2019