St. Louis-Illinois toll bridge an unpopular idea

Sept. 5, 2006

Residents on both sides of the Mississippi River oppose the idea of using tolls to fund a proposed St. Louis-Illinois bridge, a new poll has found.

Illinoisans, who would pay the bulk of any toll, oppose it the most, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch/KMOV-TV (Channel 4) Research 2000 poll.

Residents on both sides of the Mississippi River oppose the idea of using tolls to fund a proposed St. Louis-Illinois bridge, a new poll has found.

Illinoisans, who would pay the bulk of any toll, oppose it the most, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch/KMOV-TV (Channel 4) Research 2000 poll.

Officials in both states have agreed on the need to build a new bridge to ease traffic congestion, but they disagree on how to fund it, the Post-Dispatch reported. Missouri officials have suggested a toll of as much as $2 a trip, but Illinois officials oppose that idea, noting that Illinoisans would likely use the bridge more often than Missourians.

A poll conducted last week for the Post-Dispatch asked residents in both states whether they favor or oppose the idea of a toll to offset construction costs of a new bridge.

The poll found opponents of the idea outnumbered supporters in both states, with the most fervent opposition coming from Illinois, the newspaper reported.

Missourians split 41% in favor to 44% opposed to the idea, with 15% undecided.

There was less ambiguity in Illinois. Just 36% of respondents said they favored the idea, while 55% opposed it. Nine percent were unsure.

“I would never go across that bridge if I had to pay a $2 toll,” said poll respondent Alene Perdun.

Officials in both states worked together on a plan that initially would have called for an eight-lane, $910 million, to be funded by both states. But Missouri had trouble coming up with a funding source, the Post-Dispatch reported.

Missouri officials have suggested that a toll would be a way to offset the cost. Illinois leaders have strongly rejected that idea, saying they would rather scale back the scope of the project to lower the cost, possibly making it a four-lane companion to the Martin Luther King Bridge, according to the newspaper.

The poll was conducted for the Post-Dispatch and KMOV-TV (Channel 4) last week by Research 2000, a Maryland polling firm. Research 2000 conducts polls for more than 80 news outlets around the country.

Sponsored Recommendations

The Science Behind Sustainable Concrete Sealing Solutions

Extend the lifespan and durability of any concrete. PoreShield is a USDA BioPreferred product and is approved for residential, commercial, and industrial use. It works great above...

Powerful Concrete Protection For ANY Application

PoreShield protects concrete surfaces from water, deicing salts, oil and grease stains, and weather extremes. It's just as effective on major interstates as it is on backyard ...

Concrete Protection That’s Easy on the Environment and Tough to Beat

PoreShield's concrete penetration capabilities go just as deep as our American roots. PoreShield is a plant-based, eco-friendly alternative to solvent-based concrete sealers.

Proven Concrete Protection That’s Safe & Sustainable

Real-life DOT field tests and university researchers have found that PoreShieldTM lasts for 10+ years and extends the life of concrete.