News
Articles
Case Histories
Buyer's Guide
Career Center
April 2008
Industry Links
March 2008
Asphalt Roads
Bridges
Concrete Roads
Safety
Traffic Management
Click here for a subscription to
Roads & Bridges
Give us your feedback on our site.
Change your subscription info
Subscribe to our
Executive News Summary e-Newsletter.

News this week sponsored by: Bayer MaterialScience LLC

INDUSTRY NEWS
 Subscribe
Get the latest industry headlines conveniently in our email newsletter! Click here to subscribe.
 
 Share It
"../popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=rb&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showNewsItem*amp*newsItemId=15616&linkLabel=Legislators%20reject%20one%20toll%20bill%2C%20accept%20another" target="_new">   "../popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=rb&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showNewsItem*amp*newsItemId=15616&linkLabel=Legislators%20reject%20one%20toll%20bill%2C%20accept%20another" target="_new">Email this page to a friend
 
 More News
  • Construction industry braces for one of worst downturns in post-WWII era
  • Louisiana bill seeks to limit traffic cameras
  • Colorado governor blames Republicans for legislative failure
  • Debate on FAA reauthorization bill postponed
  • Government to help Michigan officials tap into $400 billion in private infrastructure funds
  • New S.R. 167 HOT lanes in Washington State aim to cut congestion
  • U.S. 34 bridge reopen after barge hit
  • Highway trust fund fix in jeopardy
  • Woodrow Wilson bridge project wins the Oscar of Civil Engineering
  • Chicago to receive more than $153 million in federal funding
  • DOT launches blog
  • Illinois Tollway considering reinstating beeping I-PASS transponders
  • U.S. Secretary of Transportation announces $213 million grant for Los Angeles
  • $5 billion needed annually to maintain Illinois roads and bridges, experts say
  • Oberstar presses for I-35W hearing
  • Texas governor still favors privatization for toll roads
  • Secretary Peters proposes 25% increase in fuel efficiency standards
  • AASHTO executive director reacts to McCain's gas tax holiday
  • MoDOT engineers find no bridge damages so far after earthquake
  • Pennsylvania readies itself for privatization
  • Vermont agency may have to scale back $5 million
  • 'Gas Tax Holiday' amendment offered then withdrawn
  • Nebraska Legislature overrides governor's gas tax veto
  • Florida may suspend its gas tax
  • AGC protests McCain’s proposed gas tax moratorium
  • Legislators reject one toll bill, accept another
  • Congressman subpoenas EPA for greenhouse gas waiver documents
  • California governor highlights need for trained workforce
  • Construction faces tumultuous year for projects, prices, labor, economist says
  • Consortium achieives financial close on Texas toll road project
  • CONTECH acquires European rights to CDS technology
  • Iowa bridges ranked fourth most deficient in nation
  • Court invalidates Ultimax patents
  • Kentucky governor: State resources not misused in traffic signal approval
  • U.S. Rep. Matheson stresses Utah’s need for road money
  • Capka steps down from FHWA chief post
  • Texas DOT opens new transportation management center
  • Budget office estimates $1.4B shortfall in Highway Trust Fund
  • Big Dig contractors to pay $458.2M
  • Econolite & PTV America integrate transportation technologies

  • All Current News
  • Archived News
  • Legislators reject one toll bill, accept another

    Plan to charge tolls for I-70 tunnel moves closer to Senate approval
    March 28, 2008

    The Colorado Senate Transportation Committee rejected a bill that would have levied tolls on I-70 during the weekend ski traffic rush hour and on Sundays, but approved another that would charge drivers to use the Eisnhower Tunnel located on the interstate.

    The accepted plan, introduced by Sen. Andy McElhany, was approved by the committee on a 5-2 vote and requires motorists driving through the Eisenhower Tunnel to pay a $5 toll each way.

    McElhany's bill will head to the Senate Appropriations Committee, where it must be approved before going to the full Senate.

    The bill is aimed at providing $3.5 billion for highway improvements between Floyd Hill and Summit County.

    Residents of Clear Creek, Summit and Gilpin counties would be exempt from the toll, but opponents claim that businesses in the mountain corridor depend on workers who shouldn't be tolled for driving to work.

    Other opponents argued that the toll booths could slow traffic, but McElhany told committee members that the booths would be constructed in a way that would not impede traffic.

    Federal authorities have already approved Colorado to toll the highway, so if approved in the Senate, it bill will likely go into effect.

    Colorado Sen. Dan Gibbs doesn't want that to happen.

    "We think (the toll is) bad for business, we think it's bad for Colorado! In Colorado, tourism is our second-leading economy," Gibbs said. "Us folks in the Front Range, in the foothills and in the mountain communities are united to work together to build a collaborative effort."



    Source: Rocky Mountain News   March 28, 2008


    Home   |   Advertising   |   News Search   |   Articles   |   Buyer's Guide   |   Career Center   |   Case Histories   |   Top of Page