News
Articles
Case Histories
Buyer's Guide
Career Center
August 2008
Industry Links
July 2008
Asphalt Roads
Bridges
Concrete Roads
Safety
Traffic Management
Click here for a subscription to
Roads & Bridges
Give us your feedback on our site.
Change your subscription info
Subscribe to our
Executive News Summary e-Newsletter.
Sponsored by Roads & Bridges magazine (RB)


LEARNMORE!
RSS: Roads & Bridges Articles

 Related Articles
"Making Traffic Safety a Priority"

"ON INDUSTRY"

 Editorial Categories
  • Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • New Products/Technology
  • Traffic Management
  • Transportation Design/Engineering

     Related Products
  • System Planning/Research
  • Pedestrian Detectors
  • Pedestrian Countdown Signals
  • Traffic Calming Devices
  • Traffic Control Devices

     Related Links
  • http://projects.dot..state.mn.us/nit/bicyclepedfinalreport/bikepedfinalreport.pdf
  • mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/
  • www.fhwa.dot.gov

     Share It
    "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=rb&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=4181&linkLabel=Fixing America's Pedestrian Safety Problem" target="_new">   "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=rb&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=4181&linkLabel=Fixing America's Pedestrian Safety Problem" target="_new">Email this Article to a Friend

    Fixing America's Pedestrian Safety Problem

       Terms & Conditions of Use

    Emerging engineering and design trends involving pedestrian safety
    In response to the pedestrian fatality rate, many states and localities are looking at non-traditional measures and devices to improve pedestrian safety. Some of these devices have been included in the most recent revision of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which is the standard for all signs, signals and pavement markings on roads open to public travel. Some of the devices that are not in the MUTCD are currently being considered for inclusion.

    - Tamara Redmon

    Every year, about 5,000 pedestrians are killed, representing 12% of roadway fatalities nationwide. The number of pedestrian deaths had been decreasing every year since 1991, to a low of 4,739 in the year 2000.

    However, in 2001 (the latest year for which complete data is available) the number actually went up to 4,882. In response to the pedestrian fatality rate, many states and localities are looking at non-traditional measures and devices to improve pedestrian safety. Some of these devices have been included in the most recent revision of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which is the standard for all signs, signals and pavement markings on roads open to public travel. Some of the devices that are not in the MUTCD are currently being considered for inclusion.

    One such device that was included are in roadway warning lights which evolved out of a design for in-roadway warning lights from that of an airport runway. The lighting, which the MUTCD allows to be used only at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks and not at signalized pedestrian crossings, is either embedded in the pavement or sits on top of the pavement immediately before the crosswalk line or up to 10 ft in advance of the crosswalk line.

    The flashing lights are supposed to improve safety by drawing attention to the crossing pedestrian. This could be especially effective when it is dark and drivers are less likely to see the pedestrian.

    Studies in San Jose, Calif., and elsewhere have shown that these devices increase the percentage of drivers who yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk and also increase the distance from the crosswalk at which drivers first apply their brakes when a pedestrian is crossing.

    As specified in the MUTCD, the flashing lights are activated only when a pedestrian is crossing and do not stay on all the time (staying on all the time may encourage driver non-compliance, because there is no expectation that a pedestrian is crossing when the device is always on). This can be accomplished with an automatic infrared or microwave pedestrian detection device, or can be activated by a button that the pedestrian pushes to activate the flashing. If automatic detection is used, there should also be a button for the pedestrian to push to override the system in case the automatic detection device fails.

    Pedestrian detection

    Infrared and microwave detectors can also be effective in improving pedestrian safety at signalized crossings. Instead of having to push a button to get the "WALK" signal, the detectors can automatically detect the presence of the pedestrian. The advantage is that if a pedestrian leaves the area, the signal actuation can be canceled or the pedestrian time can be shortened so vehicular traffic is not stopped unnecessarily.

    Also, if the pedestrian has not yet completed their crossing, the detector can extend the pedestrian clearance time (flashing "DONT WALK") on a real-time basis to give enough time to finish the crossing. Infrared detectors sometimes do not work well in climates that are too hot (e.g., Florida and Nevada) because they work by detecting body heat. Microwave detectors pick up movement, the disadvantage being that sometimes the wind blowing or some other minor movement can cause them to activate.

    Countdown for crossing

    Another device that localities are starting to use are countdown pedestrian signals. Countdown pedestrian signals take the "guessing" out of pedestrian crossings and let the pedestrian know exactly how long they have to cross an intersection by displaying a countdown of the number of seconds the pedestrian has left to cross. This is very useful, because many pedestrians don't understand what the flashing "DONT WALK" signal means.

    Although countdown signals have not really proven to make pedestrian crossing safer, per se, they do provide the pedestrian with more information, which pedestrians are much more comfortable with. Also, studies have shown that pedestrian countdown signals result in significantly larger percentages of "successful" crossings (i.e., pedestrians have completed their crossing before conflicting traffic gets a green light).

    Another device that is currently being considered for inclusion in the MUTCD are in-street pedestrian warning signs. These devices, constructed out of safe, flexible materials, are placed directly in the pedestrian crossing area (usually on the roadway centerline). They serve as a direct and very visible reminder to motorists that they must yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk, a move that could improve driver compliance with pedestrian related laws. Sometimes they contain a statement about the fine for non-compliance, which also is useful because drivers do not like to be hit in the pocket book.

    A disadvantage is that the signs are repeatedly struck by errant vehicles and require frequent replacement, but they are fairly inexpensive to replace.

    Understanding new technologies

    As with any new traffic control device, localities and states should carefully consider road-user understanding when they have made the decision to use a certain type of device. Drivers and pedestrians may not understand what it is they are supposed to do when they encounter it.

    Accordingly, both drivers and pedestrians must be educated about the use of anything non-standard.

    In addition, all of these devices (except in-roadway warning lights) are not currently approved under the MUTCD (although they are currently being considered) and should only be used after obtaining permission to experiment from FHWA. The January and February 2002 issues of ITE Journal contain information on applying for experimental status.

    States and localities also should focus pedestrian safety efforts on reaching out to and trying to change the behavior of pedestrians and drivers. Drivers are often guilty of not looking for and yielding to pedestrians. Pedestrians sometimes step blindly off the curb in front of vehicles and also jaywalk.

    Cellphone use distracts both drivers and pedestrians from paying adequate attention to their surroundings and to each other. Engineering countermeasures can only go so far if you have people engaging in activities that put lives at risk. Convincing people to change their behavior will have the most lasting effects, however this may be the most difficult thing to do in order to ensure pedestrian safety. TME




    Tamara Redmon works for the FHWA. She can be reached at tamara.redmon@fhwa.dot.gov.

    Source: TM+E   June-July 2003   Volume: 8 Number: 3
    Copyright © 2008 Scranton Gillette Communications


    Home   |   Advertising   |   News Search   |   Articles   |   Buyer's Guide   |   Career Center   |   Case Histories   |   Top of Page