News
Articles
Case Histories
Buyer's Guide
Career Center
Industry Links
June 2008
May 2008
Asphalt Roads
Bridges
Concrete Roads
Safety
Traffic Management
Click here for a subscription to
Roads & Bridges
Give us your feedback on our site.
Change your subscription info
Subscribe to our
Executive News Summary e-Newsletter.
Sponsored by Roads & Bridges magazine (RB)


LEARNMORE!
RSS: Roads & Bridges Articles

 Editorial Categories
  • Legislation

     Share It
    "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=rb&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=262&linkLabel=Editorial" target="_new">   "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=rb&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=262&linkLabel=Editorial" target="_new">Email this Article to a Friend

    Editorial

       Terms & Conditions of Use

    NHS overrides speed debate
    - Larry Flynn
    The bill designating the National Highway System (NHS) is passed and was signed by President Clinton Nov. 28, despite a last minute campaign to secure a veto of the legislation by safety groups and insurance companies who are opponents of the states' rights concept of establishing speed limits (see Clinton Signs Off on NHS Bill; Metrication Set Back Five Years, p 18).

    These groups were not alone in their concerns about repeal of the national speed limit. Secretary of Transportation Federico Peña had said that he had reservations about provisions in the NHS, such as speed limits, that might affect safety. However, he felt the importance of the NHS to our nation's highway system and the nation's economic well-being overrode those reservations. In October, he said that he had recommended that the president sign the bill.

    Peña was correct to urge that the bill be signed. A veto of the bill would have meant that states would have had to wait even longer to receive the $5.4 billion that had been withheld from them since the Sept. 30 deadline for passage of the bill came and went. Having the funds withheld has been a detriment to our highway safety. The money was needed to make improvements to roads that comprise the NHS, and for maintenance of the interstate system.

    AASHTO President Bill Burnett, Executive Director of the Texas DOT, wrote a letter to the president Nov. 27, echoing these sentiments. He said, "that funding is needed now for many projects important to highway traffic safety and mobility, which is a key reason why we need [the president's] signature."

    President Clinton urged states to act cautiously in raising speed limits, saying "the states, now given greater authority over issues of highway safety, must exercise this authority responsibly."
    While the debate over speed limits will continue, passage of the NHS legislation is an important achievement that bodes well for both the short- and long-term health of our nation's highways and our nation's economic vitality.

    ROADS & BRIDGES encourages comments from our readers about the magazine. We want to know what topics you, the reader, want to see covered in our pages. We invite suggestions on subjects that are important to you and your role in the highway industry. Contact the editor by telephone, fax, mail, or E-mail at RdsNBrdgs@aol.com.


    Source: Roads & Bridges   January 1996
    Copyright © 2008 Scranton Gillette Communications



    Home   |   Advertising   |   News Search   |   Articles   |   Buyer's Guide   |   Career Center   |   Case Histories   |   Top of Page